(GettyImages)

James Cole, Ph.D. won the Ig Nobel Prize in the Nutrition category for his work on cannibalism published in a Scientific Reports journal in April 2017.

In his findings, the archaeology professor posited that a human cadaver has little nutritional value in relation to other traditional diets.


Which explains why zombies are so thin.

The Ig Nobel Prize is a parody of the Nobel Prize.

It is meant for people to laugh at the more absurd scientific studies and achievements that still have valid scientific value.

The alternate prize is organized by the Annals of Improbable Research (AIR) magazine and is given every autumn to acknowledge bizarre achievements in scientific research.

Think Golden Razzie, but for science.

Past research on the subject of the nutritious value of eating the other, other white meat, implied that cannibalism was nutritional, according to a 2010 paper that was published in Current Anthropology.

However, Dr. Cole said that cannibalism among Paleolithic humans was probably the result of societal and cultural reasons rather than out of necessity.

A Spanish expedition, led by Eudald Carbonell, Ph.D, published their findings about the nutritional value of cannibalism in the "Cultural Cannibalism as a Paleoeconomic System in the European Lower Pleistocene."

"The numerous evidences of cannibalism, the number of individuals, their age profile, and the archaeostratigraphic distribution suggest that cannibalism in TD6 was nutritional."


But Cole couldn't find any empirical evidence supporting the theory that hunting and consuming other humans was a necessity for survival.

Or any easier or more nutritious than other food sources.

To demonstrate this, he compared the nutritional value of other meats available for consumption with that of Paleolithic humans by breaking down their caloric intake.



He found:

"whole cannibalistic episodes hold the same calorific value or less than many individual large faunal species (for example: mammoth, rhinoceros, auroch, bison, cow, bear, horse, giant deer, red deer, musk-ox, deer, boar or reindeer)."

Therefore, he concluded that the faunal intake of calories was more than the meat of hominids could provide to sustain energy.


There is plenty of evidence that cannibalism existed at different points in human history, but Cole suggests that the practice was adopted more for a cultural standpoint.

Inverse acknowledged chimpanzees as an example of this.

Paul Pettitt, Ph.D., a professor of archaeology at the University of Durham who is not associated with Cole's research, told The Guardian:

"Such behaviors clearly form something like a behavioral ritual—an unconscious act that stemmed from common activities central to group behavior like eating meat."
"Somewhere along the line of human evolution this behavior turned from behavioral rituals to ritualized behavior, and as Coles shows very well, evidence does clearly reveal that eating human meat was not exclusively about survival."




Based on Cole's use of the human nutritional template, humans "fall within the expected range of calories for an animal of our average body weight," but we don't necessarily have as much to offer by way of calories.

"We are, however, significantly lower in calorie value when compared to single large fauna (such as mammoth, bison, cattle and horse) that have a much greater calorific return per individual than many of the groups of cannibalised human remains."


The Ig Nobel Prize is a play on the word "ignoble," which means, "characterized by baseness, lowness, or meanness."


H/T - GettyImages, Twitter, Inverse, Nature, Wikipedia

Photo by Louis Hansel on Unsplash

Some years ago, I had to advise a college friend to stop chasing the girl he was interested in at the time. She'd already turned him down. Explicitly. At least two or three times.

He wouldn't take no for an answer and didn't see anything wrong with his behavior.

Perhaps he'd seen too many movies where the guy eventually breaks through the girl's defenses and essentially coerces her into going out with him?

Keep reading... Show less
Caleb Woods/Unsplash

Parents make mistakes. We want to believe that parents are doing there very best to raise their kids, but sometimes they do more harm than good.

Research into childhood trauma didn't actually begin until the 1970s, so we don't have as much knowledge about our mental health as adults as we might like.

However, a study that followed 1,420 from 1992 to 2015 found conclusive results about childhood trauma:

"'It is a myth to believe that childhood trauma is a rare experience that only affects few,' the researchers say."
"Rather, their population sample suggests, 'it is a normative experience—it affects the majority of children at some point.'"
"A surprising 60 percent of those in the study were exposed to at least one trauma by age 16. Over 30 percent were exposed to multiple traumatic events."

Not all of the things our parents do that were not so helpful technically classify as trauma, but it definitely has an effect on us as we get older.

Keep reading... Show less
Ann on Unsplash

Breaking up is something that never gets easier.

Keep reading... Show less

On the outside, so many professions and careers look glamorous, financially enticing, and fun.

Often we sit back in our own lives and wallow in our dead-end jobs with that "wish I could do that for a living mentality!"

But if you look a little closer or, much like Dorothy Gale in OZ, just wait for a Toto to push the curtain back, you'll see that a lot more is going on behind the scenes.

And the shenanigans we don't see, make all that fun... evaporate.

So many careers and high power industries are built on a foundation of lies, backstabbing, and stress. And not in that fun "Dynasty" way.

That quiet, dead-end gig may not be so bad after all.

Redditor MethodicallyDeep wanted hear all the tea about certain careers, by asking:

What is a secret in your industry that should be talked about?
Keep reading... Show less