Proposal To Slow Climate Change By 'Dimming The Sun' Gets Roasted—But Scientists Say 'Not So Fast'

A recent study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Yale Universities analyzed the potential cost and effects of a previously untested way to fight climate change: "solar geoengineering." This technique would involved pumping chemicals into the atmosphere to reduce the amount of sunlight making it to the earth's surface.

Many news outlets from around the world interpreted that as "dimming the sun."



People were disgusted that we'd consider fighting the sun before fixing the problems that have caused climate change.

Dimming the sun sounds like a plot line from a bad disaster movie.



Or perhaps like a few movies we've actually seen before.


A scientist involved in the study chimed in on Twitter, accusing news outlets like CNN of oversimplifying their work.

In truth, the report was simply analyzing the potential costs of the procedure—not proposing it.


Regardless, Twitter users knew where they stood when it came to the idea.



Ultimately, solar geoengineering would be far from a simple solution.



Enjoy that sun while you can because, if we don't get our act together and reduce carbon emissions, our only option might be to dim it!

H/T - Twitter, CNN

As the saying goes, you can't believe everything you read.

But every now and then, you might find yourself reading or hearing a piece of information that you at first think couldn't possibly be real.

Until you are presented with verified, reliable information to back it up... Then you have to eat your words and put your disbelief behind you.

Perhaps the most surprising instances of these are statistics, which at first glance you can't possibly believe are accurate and find yourself proven otherwise.

Keep reading...Show less
a graduation cap and a green tassel on a piece of wood
Photo by Dragos Blaga on Unsplash

Earning a college degree, especially a doctorate, takes a heck of a lot of work and definitely requires intelligence. Expertise in your usually narrow field of study definitely doesn't guarantee expertise in other areas — especially common sense, it seems.

Keep reading...Show less
turned on projector
Photo by Jeremy Yap on Unsplash

When it comes to TV and movies, acting is everything. A good actor can make a bad TV show good, while a bad actor can do the opposite.

While the main character is the person viewers focus on for the most part, the villain may be the most important character.

Without the villain, our main character wouldn't be interesting.

The actor or actress who plays the villain needs to be top-notch. A great example of this is Imelda Staunton, who played Dolores Umbridge in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1.

Umbridge was a truly despicable character, made more evil by the fact that she posed as someone working for the greater good and held a position of authority over all the heroic characters. Staunton did a great job portraying her exactly as the books described, and made viewers hate her just as much as we hated her in the books.

As the main villain in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, a poor performance would've destroyed the movie. Instead, this is often the movie fans like the best.

Redditors know the importance of a good villainous performance and are eager to share their opinions on the best in TV and movie history.

Keep reading...Show less

Sometimes the most outlandish ideas sound totally plausible.

In this day and age when 'Saturday Night Live' and 'The Onion' sound like credible news sources, anything is possible.

It feels like a lot of humans will believe literally anything.

Keep reading...Show less